Uncountable
Gallery 1 / 6

Gallery 1

The Intuition

Intuition

∞

What is infinity?

Most people think of natural numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ...

You can never finish writing them. That's our intuition of infinity:

A sequence that never ends.

How far can you count?

0

You can count forever...
but can you say it's "already done"?
但你能说它"已经数完了"吗?

In 1638, someone noticed something strange...

Scroll down ↓

Gallery 2

The Paradox

Paradox

In 1638, Galileo compared two sequences of numbers.伽利略比较了两串数字。

The first: natural numbers — starting from 1, adding 1 each time:

Natural numbers

Perfect squares

The second: perfect squares — the square of some natural number:

1²=1, 2²=4, 3²=9, 4²=16, 5²=25, …

Scroll down ↓
Angle 1

Count them yourself: how many squares?

Here are the first 50 natural numbers.
Which ones do you think are perfect squares? Tap to try.
你觉得哪些是完全平方数?点出来试试。

0 Squares you found
0 You skipped
0 Wrong picks

Out of the first 50 natural numbers, only 7 are perfect squares (1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49).7 个 平方数(1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49)。

The other 43 were skipped.

What about a larger range?

Squares Skipped

Conclusion 1: Squares are fewer than natural numbers — just a tiny fraction of them.

Angle 2

Another angle: can every number be paired?

If every natural number can be paired with a square, they're equally numerous.

The rule is simple: for any natural number n, its square is n².

Try it — can you find a number that can't be paired?

You tried 0 numbers, and every one paired up.0 个数,每一个都配上了。

Try a few more? Or — do you think you can find one that won't pair?

In fact, every natural number n has a corresponding n². No exceptions.任何自然数 n 都有对应的 n²。这条规则没有例外。

Conclusion 2: Squares and natural numbers are equally numerous — each natural number uniquely maps to a square.

Collision

Paradox

Angle 1

Squares are fewer than natural numbers

They're a subset; many numbers are skipped

vs

Angle 2

Squares and natural numbers are equally numerous

They can be paired one-to-one, none left over

Both conclusions are true. But they contradict.

How can a part equal the whole?

Galileo's response: "Infinity cannot be compared.""无限不可比较。"

He turned and walked away.

Gallery 3

The Question

Question

Two and a half centuries later, Georg Cantor asked a question no one had asked:格奥尔格·康托尔问了一个人没问过的问题:

Are all infinities the same size?

He asked something specific first: can the decimals between 0 and 1 be arranged in a list?
Try writing a few decimals between 0 and 1 (at least 8 recommended).
试着写几个 0 到 1 之间的小数(建议至少 8 个)。

Your list is empty. Start writing.

你已收集了 0 个数字

This table claims to contain all decimals between 0 and 1.

Scroll down — the table seems endless...

Gallery 4

The Diagonal

Diagonal

Cantor said: "Let me see the diagonal of this table.""让我看看这张表的对角线。"

Click the button to see how Cantor finds the diagonal.

Take the diagonal digits and add 1 to each.
If it's 9, it becomes 0.
如果到 9 就变成 0。

New number: 0.

We just built a new decimal. Is it in the table?

New number: 0.

没有一行能匹配。不管你往表里加多少数进去,这个新数字永远不在表里。因为表里每个数字总有至少一位和这个新数字不一样,那必然就不是同一个数。

The screen shows only finitely many rows and digits for visibility; the full argument changes the corresponding digit in every row of an infinite list.

Gallery 5

The Consequence

Consequence

This new number isn't in the table.

But the table claims to contain all decimals.

Contradiction.

So — the table was never complete.

No matter how you arrange them, the diagonal +1 always produces a number not in the table.

Arranging into a table means each decimal gets a number —

1st, 2nd, 3rd...

But it's been proven: decimals can't be arranged into a table.

Some decimals will always be left without a number.

Remember Galileo?

Pairable means equally many.

Unpairable means more.

Natural numbers

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …

✓ Can be arranged

Every number has a position:
Row 1, Row 2, Row 3...
第 1 行、第 2 行、第 3 行……

Infinite

vs

Decimals between 0 and 1

0.3, 0.14, 0.827, …

✗ Cannot be arranged

Some always miss out:
the diagonal always escapes
对角线总能造出漏网的

Infinite, but bigger

The decimals between 0 and 1

are more than all natural numbers.

Not just a few more.

Too many to fit in any table.

∞

Infinity has sizes.

Some infinities are bigger than others.

Gallery 6

The Epitaph

Epitaph

Galileo Galilei

1638

Galileo glimpsed the shadow of infinity, and turned away.

Georg Cantor

1891

Cantor walked in.

The diagonal argument confirmed that infinity wasn't one kind.

Some infinities are bigger than others.

Start over ↻

Created by Victor42 & Vik | CodeVictor42 & Vik | Code